Connect via MCP →

Enter Calculation

Formula

Advertisement

Results

Mitral Valve Area
1.47
cm²
Pressure Half-Time 150 ms
Formula 220 / PHT

What Is the Mitral Valve Area Calculator?

This calculator estimates the mitral valve area (MVA) from the Doppler-derived pressure half-time (PHT) measured during echocardiography. The pressure half-time is the time it takes for the peak transmitral pressure gradient to fall to half its initial value. In patients with mitral stenosis, a tighter (smaller) valve area slows pressure decay, lengthening the PHT. The relationship was popularized by Hatle and colleagues and remains a routine clinical estimate.

Cross-section of the heart highlighting the narrowed mitral valve opening between left atrium and left ventricle
The mitral valve orifice area separates the left atrium and left ventricle; a smaller area indicates stenosis.

How to Use It

Enter the pressure half-time in milliseconds (ms) as measured from the mitral inflow Doppler tracing. The calculator divides the empirical constant 220 by your PHT value to return the estimated valve area in square centimeters (cm²). A larger PHT yields a smaller estimated valve area.

The Formula Explained

The equation is simply $$\text{MVA} = \frac{220}{\text{Pressure Half-Time (ms)}}$$ where 220 is an empirically derived constant and PHT is in milliseconds. For example, a PHT of 220 ms gives an area of exactly 1.0 cm². Mitral stenosis is generally graded as mild (MVA > 1.5 cm²), moderate (1.0–1.5 cm²) and severe (< 1.0 cm²).

Doppler spectral waveform of mitral inflow showing pressure half-time measurement
Pressure half-time (PHT) is measured from the slope of the mitral inflow Doppler E-wave.

Worked Example

Suppose a patient has a measured pressure half-time of 440 ms. Then $$\text{MVA} = \frac{220}{440} = 0.5 \text{ cm}^2$$ indicating severe mitral stenosis. A PHT of 110 ms would give \(\frac{220}{110} = 2.0\) cm², a normal-to-mild range.

FAQ

Is this a diagnostic tool? No. It is an educational estimate. Clinical decisions must rely on a full echocardiographic assessment by a qualified cardiologist.

When is the PHT method unreliable? It can be inaccurate immediately after balloon valvuloplasty, with significant aortic regurgitation, abnormal LV/LA compliance, or tachycardia. In these settings other methods (planimetry, continuity equation) are preferred.

Why the constant 220? It is an empirical value derived from clinical correlation studies relating PHT to invasively measured valve areas.

Last updated: