Connect via MCP →

Enter Calculation

Formula

Advertisement

Results

Concentration
0.000079
mol/L (M)
In micromolar (µM) 79.37 µM
Formula c = A / (ε · l)

What This Calculator Does

This tool calculates the molar concentration of a substance in a solution from its measured absorbance, using the Beer-Lambert law. It is widely used in analytical chemistry, biochemistry, and spectrophotometry to convert UV-Vis readings into meaningful concentration values.

How to Use It

Enter three values: the absorbance (A), a dimensionless reading from your spectrophotometer; the molar absorptivity (ε), a constant for the analyte at the chosen wavelength expressed in L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹; and the path length (l), the width of the cuvette in centimetres (typically 1 cm). The calculator returns the concentration in mol/L and also converts it to micromolar (µM) for convenience.

The Formula Explained

The Beer-Lambert law states \(A = \varepsilon \cdot l \cdot c\). Rearranging for concentration gives $$c = \frac{A}{\varepsilon \cdot l}.$$ Absorbance increases linearly with concentration as long as the solution is not too concentrated. The molar absorptivity describes how strongly a chemical species absorbs light at a given wavelength, while the path length accounts for how far the light travels through the sample.

Straight calibration line of absorbance versus concentration through the origin
Absorbance is linearly proportional to concentration, with slope \(\varepsilon \cdot l\).
Light beam passing through a cuvette of solution, attenuated over path length l
Light is absorbed as it travels the path length \(l\) through the solution.

Worked Example

Suppose you measure an absorbance of \(A = 0.63\) for a protein at 280 nm with a molar absorptivity \(\varepsilon = 6300 \ \text{L}\cdot\text{mol}^{-1}\cdot\text{cm}^{-1}\) in a standard 1 cm cuvette. Then $$c = \frac{0.63}{6300 \times 1} = 0.0001 \ \text{mol/L} = 100 \ \mu\text{M}.$$

FAQ

What units should I use? Use L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹ for ε and cm for path length to get concentration in mol/L.

Why is my result negative or zero? A blank absorbance correction may be needed; also confirm ε and path length are non-zero positive numbers.

Does the law always hold? Beer-Lambert linearity breaks down at high concentrations (typically \(A > 1\)) due to scattering and analyte interactions, so dilute the sample if needed.

Last updated: